Yet another thing there's been a lot of talk about lately:
Reaching those "on the outside." According to the Great Commission, this is one of the core functions of the church. But it requires us to identify who's out there.
A group we've focused on a lot lately is young, digitally connected millenials. This group is, indeed, on the outside as far as Christianity is concerned. Over half of them have never set foot in a church. But as far as society and culture are concerned, they're very "in."
But my life so far has been focused on a very different group: recent immigrants, the underemployed, families in poverty. This group is also often on the "outs" as far as Christianity is concerned.
(Many of them claim religion, of either Roman Catholic or Evangelical background. But they don't identify with the parishes in the area because those denominations aren't meeting their current needs.) But they're also "out" in terms of society and culture. They live 2 families to 1 townhouse, work 3 jobs to feed their kids, drive a 1994 Corolla, and don't have regular internet access. Or dental care. Or, sometimes, jeans that fit. Their kids know how to use technology, but lack the financial resources to take advantage.
But it seems like all our creative and financial energy is going towards tech-ing up the church.
(I speak not of my own congregation specifically, but of church leadership and membership in general). Are we deliberately excluding this second group?
This is my main objection to the debate about things like setting up online groups, killer websites, twitter networks, and using Facebook to conduct church business. These tools will help us reach one underserved segment of society, but by their nature come at the exclusion of another.
Of course, one congregation can't be all things to all people. But it seems that a whole lot of congregations have decided to go one way here, and there is a dearth of groups effectively reaching out in other directions. I'm not even sure we've all genuinely considered them -